Metadiscourse

May 02, 2005

Each morning I get up, eat slabs of meat with my fingers, and contemplate killing this blog. The writing has grown stagnant, and the narrative is dwindling into incoherence. I feel that I’ve run out of ideas — I can only post my cock online so many times before it stops being funny (even to me). Most blogs reach a point where they just suck.

“So how do I write things that don’t suck?” I asked myself, finishing my breakfast.

In his article in the New York Times, Steven Johnson came up with a plausible answer: multithreading. Steven wasn’t writing about blogs but about television; he argued quite forcefully that prime time television has gotten a lot more complex over the last 50 years. A typical show on network television intertwines many narrative threads and distinct characters to push forward a story. This complexity was unthinkable in the 1950’s where TV shows were linear as not to confuse the audience. Modern television embraces confusion, Steven argues, and is not afraid to place cognitive demands on the audience. Instead of delivering meaning, TV expects viewers to discover connections.

When it comes to blogs, the idea of multithreading is especially relevant because on blogs narration is never self-contained. Every single piece of information connects with other pieces of information; narratives often span not just across a single blog, but across multiple sites. The very structure of hypertext encourages the interweaving of stories, and also makes it easy for readers to delve into this complexity.

Words intermingle in beautiful ways.

But so far I’ve been trying to simplify this complexity. I approach every entry as a self-contained narration, a distinct unit of information, even though I’m deeply aware that each story connects on many levels with many other stories. Threads follow each other viciously. My hesitation to embrace complexity has ultimately made the writing itself stale and unimaginative. I want each story to connect with what went before and the discourses that surround it, but I haven’t yet found a good way of doing so.

So, let’s find ways to multithread narratives, or give up writing altogether.

Posted by Tudor at 11:51 PM in Writing & the Media | TrackBack

Comments

are you sure you don’t believe in synchronicity? ‘cause i’ve been feeling the same damn thing, although my life, and hence my blogging, is to date, no-where near as dramatic, or extensive as yours - still…i couldn’t have said it better myself

Posted by: karen on May 03, 2005 at 02:48 AM

Don’t kill this blog. Whatever would I do for entertainment??

But you mentioned a lot of good points… Hmm…

Posted by: Jackie on May 03, 2005 at 01:56 PM

Please, I beg you- don’t kill the blog! I know the most intelligent and creative people are the most self-critical, but compared to other blogs that I have happened upon- yours is a work of genius. I didn’t mean that to be a back-handed compliment- seriously. I got your weblog address from a list of someone’s favorite blogs, and I have been totally entertained so far. (And as for that other poor unfotunate’s blog- ACK! What a snoozer! She needs to take some of your writing tips to heart.)

Keep up the good work!

Posted by: jules on May 03, 2005 at 04:08 PM

i am reading You now…

Posted by: kim on May 03, 2005 at 05:38 PM

Well, there are trackbacks, and that has provided some good multi-threaded narratives that you speak of.

Posted by: Jason on May 03, 2005 at 07:28 PM

I don’t mean trackbacks, silly. I’m thinking of something along the lines of tagging but more intense — some way to tap into the collective unconscious. Blogs are good at categorizing information but it would be neat if we could go beyond that and map constellations of connections. Thus, individual blog entries wouldn’t fit into a static category but would be part of a moving kaleidoscope of meaning.

And of course, TEXT itself would have to change.

and thanks for your comments — we’ll experiment with this reading/writing/connection thing for a while…

Posted by: Tudor on May 03, 2005 at 11:33 PM
Post a comment






Remember personal info?